Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
ISSN: 1303 - 2968   
Ios-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Androit-APP Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Views
11581
Download
1873
 
©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2015) 14, 386 - 393

Research article
Individual versus Standardized Running Protocols in the Determination of VO2max
Paula F. Sperlich1,2, , Hans-Christer Holmberg3, Jennifer L. Reed4, Christoph Zinner5, Joachim Mester1,2, Billy Sperlich5
Author Information
1 Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
2 German Research Centre of Elite Sports, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
3 Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
4 Minto Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada
5 Department of Sport Science, University of Würzburg, Germany

Paula F. Sperlich
✉ Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
Email: p.sperlich@dshs-koeln.de
Publish Date
Received: 13-11-2014
Accepted: 26-02-2015
Published (online): 01-06-2015
 
 
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an individually designed incremental exercise protocol results in greater rates of oxygen uptake (VO2max) than standardized testing. Fourteen well-trained, male runners performed five incremental protocols in randomized order to measure their VO2max: i) an incremental test (INCS+I) with pre-defined increases in speed (2 min at 8.64 km·h–1, then a rise of 1.44 km·h–1 every 30 s up to 14.4 km·h–1) and thereafter inclination (0.5° every 30 s); ii) an incremental test (INCI) at constant speed (14.4 km·h–1) and increasing inclination (2° every 2 min from the initial 0°); iii) an incremental test (INCS) at constant inclination (0°) and increasing speed (0.5 km·h–1 every 30 s from the initial 12.0 km·h–1); iv) a graded exercise protocol (GXP) at a 1° incline with increasing speed (initially 8.64 km·h–1 + 1.44 km·h–1 every 5 min); v) an individual exercise protocol (INDXP) in which the runner chose the inclination and speed. VO2max was lowest (-4.2%) during the GXP (p = 0.01; d = 0.06-0.61) compared to all other tests. The highest rating of perceived exertion, heart rate, ventilation and end-exercise blood lactate concentration were similar between the different protocols (p < 0.05). The time to exhaustion ranged from 7 min 18 sec (INCS) to 25 min 30 sec (GXP) (p = 0.01).The VO2max attained by employing an individual treadmill protocol does not differ from the values derived from various standardized incremental protocols.

Key words: Maximum oxygen uptake, aerobic power, treadmill running, ramp test, treadmill protocol


           Key Points
  • The mean maximum oxygen uptake during the GXP was lower than for all other tests.
  • Differences in the maximum rate of oxygen uptake between the various protocols exhibited considerable inter-individual variation.
  • From the current findings, it can be concluded that well trained athletes are able to perform an individually designed treadmill running protocol.
 
 
Home Issues About Authors
Contact Current Editorial board Authors instructions
Email alerts In Press Mission For Reviewers
Archive Scope
Supplements Statistics
Most Read Articles
  Most Cited Articles
 
  
 
JSSM | Copyright 2001-2024 | All rights reserved. | LEGAL NOTICES | Publisher

It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.